posted on 2017-03-22, 01:46authored byEllingsen, Peter John
Rather than interrogated, as Freud suggested in the paper he sent to Sydney a century ago,
psychoanalysis in Australia has largely been taken as a given. This has lent it an empty
coherence that is suggestive of a lie: an "almost-ness" that sharpens the outline of truth. It
is my thesis that, by failing to conceptualise what psychoanalysis is, analysts and those
who historicised psychoanalysis have joined in a larger Australian indifference to
subversive discourses of the self. In this work I explore the neglected topography of
psychoanalysis as it intersects with the lie of the land - from Freud's mistaken assessment
of aborigines as uncivilised, to the fantasy Australia had of Freud as an imagined visitor,
and as an authority able to subdue the wilderness of the unconscious. Using the work of
Jacques Lacan as a means to examine psychoanalytic orthodoxy in Australia, the thesis
considers how the major psychoanalytic theories were configured or ignored, and what
impact they had on intellectual and cultural life. I look at the way that the story of
psychoanalysis has been told in the existing historical accounts, wondering why, if Freud's
creation is, as some would contend, the grandest apparatus for the generation of
knowledge-power, it was never fully critiqued by those who claimed to know about it in
Australia.