posted on 2017-02-06, 00:28authored byAla'a O. Oteir
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is relatively uncommon, but
devastating and often leads to long-term disabilities. It affects the
patient’s functioning, health and quality of life. Pre-hospital care may
play a significant role in the reduction of secondary damage and
further neurological deterioration, recovery and outcomes of patients
following TSCI.
Review of the literature identified a paucity of high-level
evidence regarding the association between pre-hospital spinal
immobilisation and patient neurological and functional outcomes.
Therefore, the main aims of the thesis were to explore patient profiles
of those who are at-risk of sustaining TSCI, identify the differences
between at-risk and confirmed with TSCI and examine the differences
between patients with TSCI who received pre-hospital spinal
immobilisation and those who did not. All studies included adult trauma
patients who were attended, managed and transported by Ambulance
Victoria (AV) paramedics over a six-year period (2007 - 2012).
The study of those at-risk to have sustained TSCI (potential
TSCI) included 106,059 patients, with patient demographics and event
characteristics of this cohort described. Falls and traffic-related
incidents were the most common causes, with slightly more males (52.4%).
The study also provided a clear definition of potential TSCI and
baseline knowledge for future research.
The potential TSCI dataset was then linked with the Victoria
State Trauma Registry to identify patients with confirmed TSCI. This
linkage identified 257 patients with confirmed TSCI (0.2%), mainly due
to falls and traffic incidents. Patients had a median age of 49 years
with males comprising 84.1% of the cohort. In addition, there were
several independent indicators of confirmed TSCI including AV
Pre-hospital Potential Major Trauma (PMT) criteria, male gender, the
presence of neurological deficits, the presence of an altered conscious
state, sustain a high fall (> 3 meters), diving accident and
motorcycle and bicycle collisions.
The non-immobilised TSCI patients were more likely to have
sustained a low fall, be attended and managed by ALS paramedics and
transported by road ambulances to a hospital other than a major trauma
service or spinal care unit. The non-immobilised TSCI group also had
worst long-term functional outcome scores compared to the immobilised
TSCI group. The characteristics of TSCI patients who were not
immobilised led to speculating that the non-immobilised group were not
recognised or misdiagnosed by the pre-hospital care provider, which may
have led to a different pathway of care compared to those immobilised.
Outcome measurement at earlier stages of care should be validated and
considered to examine the clinical effect of pre-hospital spinal immobilisation.
This body of work provides empirical studies contributing to
the knowledge gaps relating to describing TSCI from the pre-hospital
perspectives, as well as the association between pre-hospital spinal
immobilisation and patient outcomes following TSCI.
However, large prospective studies in this field are unlikely
to be feasible and therefore we need to maximise the knowledge we can
derive from observational studies such as those undertaken in this
thesis. Meanwhile, hopefully, the findings in this thesis can improve
pre-hospital spinal care leading to improved patient outcomes and
decreased the burden of TSCI.