Version 3 2019-11-15, 00:22Version 3 2019-11-15, 00:22
Version 2 2019-11-15, 00:04Version 2 2019-11-15, 00:04
Version 1 2017-09-18, 02:17Version 1 2017-09-18, 02:17
thesis
posted on 2019-11-15, 00:22authored byJULIAN HOLCROFT
Where does the ruin
start or end? Is a ruin a self-contained object, a process of evolution or a symptom of collapse? Does natural
force or human intervention change how we respond to the ruin? In
‘Translating Ruins in Post-Earthquake Practice’ these questions coalesce around a single visual image—Gustave Doré’s 1872 engraving The New
Zealander which depicts the figure of an artist traveller sketching the
future ruins of the City of London sometime in the distant future. The
experience of the post-earthquake environment of the City of Christchurch and
Walter Benjamin’s repurposing of eyewitness accounts of the 1755
Lisbon earthquake from Enlightenment for Children (1933),
establishes my study and transcription of ruins through memory as a
‘post-earthquake’ practice. I argue that this is a practice that can unlock a political,
economic and creative interpretation of ruins. This is a position grounded
in my studio practice and explored in a series of photo-media epoxy resin
and plastic relief collages that reside between painting, sculpture and
architecture. The repurposing of materials and art objects as a form of
creative substitution informs the studio research through projects that embrace bricolage, fragmentation and ceramic restoration techniques.
The relationship of the mid-twentieth century sculptural,
photographic and site-specific work of the artist Robert Smithson to a
medieval and renaissance conception of ruins and the Hypnerotomachia
Poliphili (1499), an early typology of ruins, also provides a new
context for a contemporary reassessment of the modern ruin and the place of
the ‘fragment’ in contemporary art practice.