monash9255.pdf (7.65 MB)
Download fileSmall angle x-ray scattering as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer
thesis
posted on 2017-01-13, 00:22 authored by Sidhu, SabeenaBreast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Australian women.
Current pathological analysis examines a small section of tissue for cellular and
plasma abnormalities using a light microscope. However, this method of diagnosis,
despite being the current gold standard, has its limitations, where human error and
professional experience can influence a patient’s diagnosis. A potential alternative or
adjunct to conventional histopathology for classifying tissue disease status is offered
by Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS).
At the time of commencement of this work, there had been several small
scale studies which examined the potential of SAXS to classify the disease status of
breast tissue. These tended to focus on the supramolecular structure of collagen fibrils
found in the breast, where it is known that the degradation of these fibres is related to
the spread of disease. Most previous studies also used a synchrotron as an X-ray
source, due to the intense and highly collimated flux available. This study used a
synchrotron source, but also evaluated the use of a laboratory X-ray source, as a more
convenient and relatively inexpensive alternative that could one day find application
in the clinic. The work presented in this thesis analyses the largest cohort of patients
and breast tissue samples studied to date using SAXS: 130 patients with 543 tissue
samples. Tissues were sourced from surgical waste and classified into four groups:
invasive carcinoma, benign, normal, and mammoplasty. Mammoplasty tissue samples
were harvested from patients undergoing breast reduction and/or reconstruction,
where no history or presence of disease was indicated. Normal tissue was sampled
from patients with known disease, but pathological analysis of the tissue core
diagnosed it as normal. A comprehensive analysis of the scattering patterns was
carried out, analysing features arising from the collagen structure and orientation, the
total scattered intensity, and adipose tissue in the breast. Features related to the axial
D-spacing of the collagen fibrils within the breast tissue as well as the integrated
scattering intensity (called amorphous scatter) demonstrated the highest ability to
discriminate tissue types, in SAXS images acquired from both the synchrotron source
and the laboratory X-ray source.
The amorphous scatter intensities obtained using a synchrotron source
showed highly significant differences (p < 0.01) for almost all of the tissue pair
comparisons: invasive carcinoma vs. benign, invasive carcinoma vs. normal, invasive
carcinoma vs. mammoplasty, benign vs. mammoplasty, and normal vs.
mammoplasty. However, no significant difference was seen in the amorphous scatter
between benign versus normal tissues (p = 0.30). The amorphous scatter values
increased with severity of disease, i.e. it was the highest for invaded tissues and
decreased progressively from benign to normal to mammoplasty. There was a
significant difference between normal and mammoplasty tissue types using the
amorphous scatter as a discriminator (p = 0.0025). Pathological assessment cannot
differentiate between these two tissue types, which suggests that there may be
changes occurring in these tissue structures at the supramolecular level that can be
characterised using SAXS.
The ability of SAXS to reveal structural differences between normal and
mammoplasty tissue types is highly significant, for both disease diagnosis and
treatment, as well as for understanding disease progression. For example, these
differences might aid in determining surgical margin clearance of excised breast
lesions as well as potentially provide a means of pre-screening or perhaps improve
false-negative rates of diagnosis. The potential of SAXS to reveal macroscopic extent
and directional spread of disease was explored using two-dimensional mapping of the
amorphous scatter. These maps showed broad agreement with histopathological
diagnosis, but further investigation regarding their reliability and interpretation for
clinical utility is still needed. Changes in both the amorphous scatter and the axial D-
spacing were seen in tissue samples up to 6 cm away from the primary site of disease.
In particular, a significant decrease in both parameters was seen between the centre
of the tumour (at 0 cm) and 2 cm away, suggesting that closer examination of the
tissue structures over the disease/healthy tissue border may provide information
regarding the mechanisms of metastasis and growth of cancerous tumours.
The combination of the amorphous scattering results from the two X-ray
sources indicates that the size of the scatterers may be the key in classifying tissue
types. The synchrotron source was able to access a lower q-range (q = 0.1-0.6 nm-1)
and the laboratory source covered a larger q-range (q = 0.25-2.3 nm-1). Mammoplasty
tissues appear to be characterised by large scattering components (d > 25.13 nm),
whereas normal tissues are characterised by slightly smaller scattering components
(10.47 nm < d < 25.13 nm) and benign tissues by even smaller scattering components
(4.83 < d < 10.47 nm). It appears that the size of the scatterers contributing to the
total scattering intensity decreases with severity of disease, which was seen
independently with both X-ray sources. Further investigation is warranted to
determine the biological origin of these differences. These results also suggest that
the optimum SAXS instrument may need to cover a scattering vector range of q <
0.25 nm-1 to identify differences in healthy tissue types, and q > 2.3 nm-1 to possibly
investigate invasive carcinoma tissue types. A SAXS apparatus that can examine a
large q-range may provide all of the necessary information from the amorphous
scatter to differentiate between tissue groups.
The periodic structure of collagen fibrils along their longitudinal axis can be
characterised by the axial D-spacing, where this spacing was found to change with
the presence of disease. The axial D-spacing for healthy breast tissues was found to
be significantly lower in normal and mammoplasty tissues compared to invaded
tissues (p = 0.0050 and p = 0.0093, respectively). However, no significant differences
between the other tissue group pairs were seen (p > 0.05). These differences were
evident in classification modelling of the four tissue groups, where the amorphous
scatter and the amplitude of a collagen axial peak were used to build a probability
model for disease status. The model showed high sensitivities (> 70%) and widely
variable specificities (ranged from 18-97%) for the data examined with the
synchrotron source. This means that the model was a good indicator of disease, but
poor at indentifying healthy tissue types.
The work presented in this thesis shows that SAXS is capable of
distinguishing breast tissue types with high sensitivity and has the potential to
become a significant tool for the investigation of cancer progression or even
diagnosis. Further investigation into the amorphous scatter and axial D-spacing in
particular may provide insight into the biological mechanisms related to tissue
degradation associated with invasive disease.