Version 2 2022-08-25, 04:03Version 2 2022-08-25, 04:03
Version 1 2017-03-29, 22:56Version 1 2017-03-29, 22:56
thesis
posted on 2022-08-25, 04:03authored bySrinivasan Narayanan
This
thesis contains study of localized corrosion behavior (sensitization and
passivation) of coldworked austenitic stainless steel (SS). This has been
covered in three parts: the first part deals with in-grain misorientation and
sensitization, second part deals with effects of deformed microstructure on
passivation, and the third part deals with study of Cr2O3 characterization at machined
sub-surfaces. Three different grades of austenitic SS grades (Sanicro 28TM 1
hereinafter called as alloy A, AISI (American Irons and Steel Institute) 316L
and 304L) were selected in this study. In the first part, AISI type 304L
austenitic SS was cold rolled (25ºC) and warm rolled(300ºC) followed by
isothermal sensitization. Quantification of near boundary gradient zone was
done, partially automated, by appropriate computer algorithms. One-to-one
microstructural correlation was achieved by electron backscattered diffraction
(EBSD) and white light interferometry (WLI). Grains with visible fragmentation,
or clear reductions in size, showed a poor resistance to sensitization.
However, non-fragmented deformed grains with clear presence of near boundary
orientation gradients provided an improved resistance.
For the second part, alloy A, 316L and 304L were subjected to
anodic potentiodynamic polarization test in 0.5M H2SO4 at room temperature
after plane strain compression test. Deformation microstructures developed in
these grades, after plain-strain compression tests, include strain-induced
martensite. Alloy A showed the poor corrosion performance among three alloys.
Combination of microtexture measurements and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR)-imaging revealed that the presence of strain-induced martensite promoted
postpassivation stability or retention of a protective Cr2O3 film.
In the third part, alloy A, 316L and 304L of austenitic SS
were subjected to vertical milling. These alloys exhibited difference in
stacking fault energy and thermal conductivity. Anodic potentiodynamic
polarization tests did not reveal differences (between machined specimens) in sub-surface
machined layers. However, such differences were revealed in surface roughness, sub-surface
residual stresses, misorientations, and detection of subsurface Cr2O3 passive
films. It was shown, quantitatively, that higher machining speed reduced surface
roughness & the effective depths of the affected subsurface layers.
1 Sanicro
28 is an alloy marketed by Sandvik®. It is sold under the trademark