posted on 2017-07-10, 04:49authored byDoug McCurry
This research reviews
the history of the Mayer Key Competencies from the early 1990s to the present.
In sketching the development of the Key Competencies in Australia, I compare
them with other notions of work-related skills developed internationally at
about the same time.
I focus on the ambitious assessment proposals of the Mayer
Committee and the different views and arguments that were made about those
proposals. Having reviewed the Key Competencies debate, I analyse notions of
competence and ability and distinguish the generic Mayer competencies from
other ideas of competence and competencies. As a result of this analysis I
argue that the Mayer Key Competencies must be seen as generic abilities rather
than specific competencies. I also argue that the Key Competencies are not
achievements but rather that they are best thought of as aptitudes that predict
abilities to learn new things.
I consider 100 years of research in psychometrics and
cognitive psychology about generic abilities with particular attention to the
work of H. Gardner, R. J. Sternberg, J. B. Carroll and S. J. Ceci. As a result
of this analysis I sketch a model of cognitive abilities within an overarching
model of performance.
I then turn from the theoretical and research literature on
generic abilities to consider what happened to the assessment proposals that
were referred by the Mayer Committee to the curriculum and assessment
authorities in the various states and territories of Australia. I undertook
reviews of Key Competencies assessment issues for the Commonwealth and the
Victorian governments in 1996, and in that work I proposed a regime for
school-based assessment of levels of performance on the Key Competencies. With
Commonwealth Government support this proposal was trialled in 10 secondary
schools with 110 teachers assessing 350 Year 11 students in 1997. The aim of
the trial was to have students separately assessed by groups of teachers to see
what degree of agreement there was between different teachers from different subject
areas.
Through this trial I developed the notion of whole-school
assessment in which all the teachers of a student contribute to a single,
integrated report on the generic abilities of a student. In the trial I
conceptualised and implemented a cost-effective method of producing a
collective view of a student from all the teachers of that student.
The assessment trial showed that teachers could in most cases
make global, impression judgements of Key Competencies performances with no
more that three minutes formal reflection per student. The judgements made by
different teachers were quite consistent with each other, and as a result they
can be validly and reliably used to develop an overall report for a student.
The teachers participating in the trial judged the assessment procedures to be
efficient and cost-effective.
Analysis of the assessments of teachers participating in the
trial shows that pairs of teachers (from any combination of subject areas)
typically produce an acceptable level of agreement in about 90% of cases. The
further work I have done on the whole-school assessment of Key Competences has
demonstrated on three other occasions that the whole-school assessment process
I have developed is practical and useful.