posted on 2017-01-13, 00:15authored byRatnaike, Arvind Viranga
This thesis investigates transformation of forms of indication; a transition from data
in one form to a description in another form. The data input indicates a situation;
the description output indicates a situation. Though both should, ideally, indicate
the same situation, there is likely to be a drift in what situation is indicated. A
theory for transformation by emergence is introduced, as is a framework for the
transformation. The framework can transform an available known form of reference
to a more accessible, destination form. This destination form is also the form of a
domain knowledge source.
This kind of reference transformation is a specialization of a more general prob-
lem: that of improving indication; using possibly multiple source forms resulting
in possibly multiple destination forms. The improvement should outweigh the
cumulative error incurred during the act of improvement. In general, automatic
interpretation of multimedia or sensory cues remains a challenge. Synthesis of
interpretation is partly completed in the mind of the recipient, where association
with prior experience, of both notions and indication thereof, takes place. The scope
of the thesis is constrained to what a machine can manipulate. Lateral reference
transformation should occur during early emergence. The transformation results in a
collection of partial descriptions, which can be used to compose a greater situational
description.
The reference transformation framework is based on an underlying philosophy of
emergence. Situational descriptions emerge from the interaction of domain knowl-
edge and situational data. An assumption is made that data and knowledge elements
can interact. The reference transformation is lateral, in the sense that the principal
quality being increased by emergence is clarity rather than complexity.
Domain knowledge is converted to a modifiable internal entity known as a bridg-
ing entity. The framework is designed to be independent of media types. The
framework adopts the destination form as the basis of the internal form of the
bridging entity. It is the bridging entity that is gradually manipulated rather than
the media of the original situational data indicators or references. Interaction of
the bridging entity with situational data, creates a perturbed bridging entity. The
bridging entity can be progressively perturbed through interaction with further data,
resulting in an entity that is acceptable as a description of the situation. The
final bridging entity is mapped back to an accessible knowledge form, based on an
auxiliary entity that stores system experience. Confidence in the acceptability of
transformation is based on how much of the situation is considered familiar.
Context is considered from two perspectives. From the perspective of the data,
it is the knowledge and the experience available for interpretation. This includes
entities and concepts that aren’t directly observable in the data. From the perspec-
tive of the description, context is whatever influences the emergence and subsequent
interpretation, without being explicitly indicated by the description.
The framework is investigated by considering its various aspects, in the contexts
of disparate situational domains. The conclusions, based on this investigation, lead
to modifications to the initial theory and framework.
History
Campus location
Australia
Principal supervisor
Balasubramaniam Srinivasan
Year of Award
2009
Department, School or Centre
Information Technology (Monash University Clayton)