posted on 2017-02-13, 00:59authored byGulzar Malik
Considering the
growing need to adopt an evidence-based practice (EBP) approach in response to
increasing complexities in healthcare, nurses must be adequately prepared in
their undergraduate degrees to implement EBP in clinical practice. However,
there is a plethora of studies reporting that nurses’ educational preparation
for embracing EBP is consistently inadequate. EBP adoption by graduating nurses
depends on the degree to which it is prioritised by academics and the extent to
which it is integrated into the curriculum. Despite the existence of many
studies on EBP, its inclusion in nurse education is limited, and therefore
requires investigation.
The purpose of this study was to generate a substantive
theory about the processes academics undertake when incorporating EBP in their
teaching practices. In order to address the aims of the study, a constructivist
grounded theory methodology informed by Charmaz was employed. In line with
grounded theory approach, data collection and analysis were conducted
simultaneously and continued until theoretical saturation was reached.
Participant interviews, observations and document analysis were utilised to
obtain data. In total, 23 academics across Australian universities participated
in semi-structured interviews, and nine consented to be observed during their
teaching with undergraduate students. Additionally, twenty unit guides shared
by study participants were analysed to enrich data.
In response to the central problem of how undergraduate
education prepares nursing students to be evidence-based clinicians, a core
process utilised by academics to tackle with this problem is conceptualised as
“On a path to success: Endeavouring to contextualise curricula within an EBP
framework”. This theoretical construct helps to explain academics’ actions and
insights into teaching practices towards EBP integration in undergraduate
education. A central aspect of this theory reflects meanings academics
constructed around their endeavours towards achieving a fully integrated
curricula that engages students with the EBP framework, linking EBP theory to
practice. The core process is evident in three transitional stages of theory
comprising: Embarking on a journey-Being prepared, Experiencing challenges, and
Moving ahead-Linking EBP theory to practice. However, this process was mediated
by contextual conditions of academic settings and individuals, curricula and
practice settings.
Four interrelated categories present the key activities
academics were engaged with and are embedded in the core process. The first
category, Valuing and Engaging with EBP, highlights academics’ preparation
towards EBP teaching and its integration across courses. The second category,
Enacting EBP Curriculum, reflects academics’ engagement with designing and
enacting EBP and research units and working towards embedding EBP across units.
The third category, Influencing EBP Integration, explores the teaching and
learning strategies employed by academics to engage students with the EBP
process, aiming to link evidence to practice in teaching units. The final
category, Envisaging the Use of EBP, reveals how academics facilitated the use
of EBP in theory and practice. Academics responses’ and the processes they used
were influenced by three contextual factors consisting of academic settings and
individuals, curricula design and implementation, and practice settings. These
factors played an important role in academics’ endeavours to achieving a
contextualised curricula, making EBP concepts relevant to practice.
Therefore, the generated findings and theory offer valuable
insights to nurse education within Australia that are also relevant for global
nursing education. The substantive theory raises awareness of social processes
and activities undertaken by academics and highlights obstacles, which require
attention at school and practice setting levels to ensure academics are
prepared, engaged and committed to incorporate EBP concepts in their teaching
practices.