posted on 2017-03-19, 22:32authored byNatasha Xin Ci Yeow
In recent years,
paper-based diagnostic assays for blood typing have advanced rapidly for the
typing of ABO and Rh(D) blood groups. Most of these paper-based assays were
based on the direct agglutination mechanism using immunoglobulin M (IgM)
antibodies treated on paper. The attempt to directly agglutinate red blood
cells (RBCs) on paper using IgG antibodies has consistently failed. This was
expected due to the ‘non- agglutinating’ nature of IgG antibodies. The indirect
antiglobulin test (IAT), which is a 2- stage test including the sensitisation
of red blood cells (RBCs) with specific IgG antibodies and the bridging of
IgG-sensitised RBCs with anti-IgG, was developed to detect IgG antibodies and
IgG-sensitised RBCs. The IAT is routinely used in RBC antigen phenotyping,
antibody detection and identification, and cross-matching donor and recipient
for blood transfusion. Standard methods for the IAT such as the traditional
tube test, gel card column agglutination technology and solid phase assay are
cumbersome, time consuming and requires modern laboratory equipment handled by
skilled personnel. An easy-to-use paper diagnostic for IAT would be invaluable
for any blood analysis involving the IgG antibodies. IgG antibodies can cross
the human placenta, potentially resulting in haemolytic disease of the fetus
and newborn; their detection is crucial.
In this thesis, two paper-based IAT assays were developed as
proofs of concept. Both assays involved the treatment of paper with anti-IgG
that could capture IgG-sensitised RBCs. The first assay utilised the filtration
ability of paper to trap agglutinated RBCs within the fibre network while
allowing non-agglutinated RBCs to be filtered out through the pores between
fibres. Instead, the second assay was based on the principle of paper
chromatography. Once again, RBC agglutinates are trapped between the fibre
networks, but non-agglutinated RBCs are eluted away from the sample loading
point with the capillary force of a buffer solution wicking the inter-fibril
capillaries of paper. These assays do not require specific laboratory equipment
nor skills. They are simple to use and results are easy to read, eliminating
human error. Given the different mechanisms on which both assays rely upon, the
different needs and testing conditions required by end-users can be suited by
selecting the proper test.
Whilst the blood typing principle and current technologies
are well established, the fundamentals of antibody – antigen interactions
occurring within a blood typing system are poorly quantified. Blood typing
specific antibody – antigen interactions have always been reported as affinity
constants and relative binding units. The interaction force and energies have
never been reported. In particular, the interactions between the anti-IgG and
RBC surface antigen bound IgG antibodies have never been rigorously quantified.
RBC surface antigen distribution have always been observed and indirectly
evaluated using labelled antibodies coupled with scanning electron microscopy
or flow cytometry techniques. These techniques involve over-manipulation of the
RBCs and results are unspecific and general.
The atomic force microscope (AFM) is a versatile instrument
for biological imaging which can resolve features from the micro scale down to
the nano scale. It also allows imaging not only in air but also in liquid,
enabling imaging of biomolecules in physiological conditions. The unique force
mapping mode of the AFM allows the simultaneous measurement of interaction
forces and localization of sites where specific interactions have occurred.
Using the AFM force mapping mode, we have quantified for the first time the
interaction energies between anti-IgG – IgG on RBC and IgM – RBC surface
antigen while simultaneously mapping the location and quantifying the density
of the antigen sites. This was achieved by functionalizing the AFM cantilever
tip with anti-IgG and IgM antibodies, respectively, in two separate studies.
The antigen of interest in both studies was kept as the D antigen. For the
first time, the distribution of antigens on individual RBCs as mapped by
anti-IgG and the IgM-functionalized AFM tips was measured and compared under
physiological conditions and found to be similar. However, heterogeneity
observed in the distribution of antigens among RBCs isolated from a single
donor and on RBCs isolated from multiple donors bearing the same blood group
emphasized the importance of mapping antigen distribution on single cells
rather than relying on an ensemble set of information. This technique has
allowed the investigation of antigen distribution in real-time, in situ and label
free. It is anticipated that the developed technique can be expanded to the use
in the development of selective and personalized medical treatment.