posted on 2017-02-23, 01:05authored byAl Mutair, Abbas
Aim
The aim of this study was to identify the perceived needs of Saudi families with a
critically ill family member admitted to the Intensive Care Unit as perceived by
family members and healthcare providers. The study explains how family needs were
being met and who were the most appropriate healthcare providers to meet their
needs. The study also compares the families’ perceptions of their needs being met to
those of healthcare providers’. It also describes the healthcare providers’ attitudes
towards family involvement during routine care and family presence during resuscitation,
or other invasive procedures.
Background
Admission of a family member to an intensive care unit often occurs without any
warning, leaving the family in a very stressful situation. Families of intensive care
patients have specific needs that should be acknowledged and met during this time. If
unmet, the stress for the patients’ families may be increased and also produce stress
for the healthcare providers. Further, the literature is virtually silent on the issue of
recognizing the ICU family needs of Saudi or Muslim families in relation to religious
beliefs and cultural values in intensive care settings. Knowledge about health
professional’s attitudes towards family involvement during routine care and family
presence during resuscitation or other invasive procedures can inform intensive care
practice for holistic family centred care.
Design
A mixed method two phase sequential explanatory design was utilised for the study.
In Phase One, a convenience sample of 644 participants (167 family members and
477 healthcare providers) was recruited and a closed-ended questionnaire was
administered. Participants were invited from ICUs located in eight hospitals in six
major cities in Saudi Arabia. Phase Two involved face-to-face semi-structured
interviews with 12 close family members at the same participating hospitals.
Results
Family members and ICU healthcare providers perceived assurance, information and
cultural and spiritual needs as the most important needs, and proximity and support
needs as least important. The findings indicated that family members considered their
needs of assurance as being met but their needs for support as not being met.
Moreover, they considered needs related to information, proximity and cultural and
spiritual needs as not always met. Despite this, the healthcare providers identified all
the families’ needs as being successfully met. Family members recognized doctors as
the most appropriate person to meet most of their needs, followed by nurses, then
hospital administration. Healthcare providers perceived doctors as the most
appropriate person to meet most of the family needs, followed by the hospital
administration and then nurses. The healthcare providers had positive attitudes
towards family involvement during routine care, but negative attitudes towards family
presence during resuscitation or other invasive procedures.
A deeper understanding of Saudi family needs was obtained through the qualitative
results. Family members described their experiences of having a critically ill relative in the ICU. The analysis of the interview transcripts revealed six explicit themes.
These themes were: 1) looking for information; 2) maintaining reassurance; 3)
spiritual healing; 4) maintaining close proximity; 5) involvement in the care and 6)
support not being facilitated.
Conclusion
This study builds upon previous work and contributes important new nursing
knowledge about the needs of Saudi families with a relative in the ICU. In Saudi
Arabia, it is recommended that ICU nurses be prepared to recognize family needs, and
support and facilitate family involvement and caregiving. An emphasis should be
placed on the recognition of family needs in relation to the influence of cultural values
and religion. In the 21st century, models of nursing care should not just focus on the
patients’ needs but should also be focused on of the needs of the families.