File(s) not publicly available
Reason: Restricted by author. A copy can be supplied under Section 51 (2) of the Australian Copyright Act 1968 by submitting a document delivery request through your library, or by emailing email@example.com
Exposing the Ideas, Discourses, and Limitations of the Council of Australian Governments’ Closing the Gap Agenda for Health
In order to distinguish essays and pre-prints from academic theses, we have a separate category. These are often much longer text based documents than a paper.
This thesis challenges the view that the closing the gap reforms supported an innovative, ideologically neutral policy approach. Rather, the policy settings and institutional arrangements structuring the reforms promoted neoliberal ideas and practices, which have exemplified and accentuated recent policy trends in Indigenous health.
Research undertaken for this thesis shows that neoliberal values have interfaced with other influential discourses, specifically that of a biomedical model of health, to shape policies in Indigenous health. There is significant congruence between the values and assumptions that underpin biomedicine and neoliberal ideology. As a consequence, the political shift towards neoliberalism in recent decades has elevated an individualised, biomedical approach to health service and program delivery and a behavioural approach to health promotion in Indigenous health.
This thesis further explores how the neoliberal framework for reform has created a number of problems in addressing Indigenous health disadvantage, and frustrated the implementation of more efficacious policy approaches. There is little evidence to suggest that an individualised, biomedical approach can support substantive improvements in Indigenous peoples’ health and social outcomes. Health policies that promote a broader, social approach to health have proved to be relatively successful. Reflective of neoliberal ideas and practices, the closing the gap reforms understated the benefits of these potentially more effective policy approaches. Moreover, the technical, “evidence-based” framework of the reforms worked only to obscure from view, rather than promote, these alternative policy options. The conclusion drawn from this research is that the closing the gap reforms were a missed opportunity to redress the chronic failings of past policies and the longstanding crisis in Indigenous health.