The causes of rail
line accidents are apparent over the years, and there is a need to address this
situation. One of the common factors is the lack of knowledge on rail base
defects. Current technologies and methodologies on the inspection of rail track
health are limited, and often require extended hours of inspection and labour
effort. To enhance the detectability and efficiency of defect detection on rail
systems, a heat source mounted on a moving platform was proposed and tested
with computational modelling.
A flat plate model with underside defect was used for the
investigation to simulate and represent a complex rail base structure. The
presence of defects was determined by analysing surface temperature responses.
The second order peak derivative method estimated the defect depth while the
Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) method predicted the actual size of the defect
located at the underside of test plate.
The results on stationary heating showed that the prediction
of underside defect size and depth location were most accurate when
investigating for a case where a large size defect is positioned near the
inspection surface. When defect depth is increased, this prediction ability
deteriorates. For a defect at 7 mm depth, the predicted defect size is not
justified. The results on stationary test were used as a reference for moving
heat source test. The moving heat source was set up by creating sequential
stationary heating of small segments separated by a constant delay. It was
found that when this time delay was removed, the prediction of defect depth and
size was similar to the test results on stationary heating. In fact, due to the
high-speed heating, lateral heat diffusion can be assumed negligible, resulting
in similar outcome as stationary test. The minimum heating speed for this to be
true is 18km/hr. The tests in this thesis were validated with mathematical
model and previously established findings.
Edge effects are one of the main factors in affecting the
prediction accuracy of defect size and depth location. A small defect size will
experience earlier occurrence and significant edge effect whereas a large
defect size will behave oppositely. In this study, other factors such as
maximum achievable temperature and temperature contrast were also considered.
The use of high-speed moving heat source for defect detection
and measurement is feasible given that it is approximated to stationary
heating. It allows the moving heat source test method to determine minimum detectable defect size and maximum detectable defect depth.