Version 5 2017-02-22, 23:04Version 5 2017-02-22, 23:04
Version 4 2017-02-22, 05:53Version 4 2017-02-22, 05:53
Version 3 2017-02-22, 05:13Version 3 2017-02-22, 05:13
Version 2 2017-02-22, 05:10Version 2 2017-02-22, 05:10
Version 1 2017-02-22, 05:08Version 1 2017-02-22, 05:08
thesis
posted on 2017-02-22, 23:04authored byShafi Ullah Khan
Since its
foundation to date, the EU constitutional powers and supranational politics on
integration of a wide-range of national policy regimes have undergone an
unprecedented transformation to create EU-level rules. Yet, income taxation is
a policy area where a significant integrational gap still exists in the EU.
This gap primarily stems from a challenge of dual character: one, unspoken tax
powers in the constitution and, secondly, taxation – a symbol of sovereignty –
is seated deep in the national politics. Against that backdrop, the thesis
examines EU law and politics with a view to explore prospects for integration
of national tax systems on the way to institution of a single European market.
In dissecting legal dimensions of EU tax integration, the
study adopts an evolutionary approach. It follows a legal evolution model where
EU-level legislative powers remain “mobile” in the quest of attaining a single
market pursuant to fundamental freedoms and constitutional prohibitions. The
analysis builds on a process of “communautairization” of national policy
regimes wherein relational framework between the Member States gradually evolve
and transform from the one based on the international legal model to an EU
legal order. On the other hand, in examining the European tax politics, the
study relies heavily on neofunctional model that theorizes creation of EU (tax)
rules alongside and beyond the policymaking based truly on national
decision-making. The political dimension also takes into account the
transnational pushes generated by the rise of recent anti-avoidance tide around
the globe, and the way EU-level tax politics may possibly capitalize on it and
transpose it into European tax order.
The study finds that consistent with growing competences in
other policy areas, EU legislative powers in tax domain also expand. The study
posits that this premise holds more relevance to the post-Lisbon era. In the
same vein, based on a temporal analysis, the study also suggests that tax
policymaking is not immune to supranational politics. If viewed through a
larger picture paradigm, the pooling of tax authority continues from national
level to the EU. The legal and political analysis of the recent application of
state aid rules to income taxes suggests that the tax-aid activity, in
prospect, might pave a way towards tax measures in the pursuit of a
“one-European-voice” in tax deals with the non-EU jurisdictions. Likewise, the
developments post-relaunch of the CCCTB plan indicate that it is likely that a
recent shift in EU approach may result in some real progress on common tax base
rules for companies first the time in the European history. The thesis finally
concludes that the EU could, and indeed should, move on to integrate national
tax systems to address challenges to the establishment of a real, efficient and
sustainable single market.