Abusive supervision
climate (ASC) affects not only subordinates but also their colleagues who work
in the same group; however, little is known about how it impacts them. To
constitute an ASC at the group level, this research employed the referent-shift
consensus model to aggregate subordinates’ perceptions of supervisory abuse.
Furthermore, the present research examined the effects of ASC on subordinates’
anger and subsequent work performance. Specifically, drawing from the affective
events theory (AET), this study examined the indirect effects of an ASC on
group members’ organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and withdrawal, via
the mediating role of anger. In addition, group members’ agreeableness and
neuroticism were predicted to moderate the relationship between group members’
anger and work behaviours. Analyses of data collected from 51 work groups
across different organisations and industries in Pakistan revealed that ASC was
negatively related to OCBs, and that anger mediated the relationship between
ASC and both outcomes (OCBs and withdrawal). In addition, agreeableness was
found to moderate the effect of group members’ anger on OCBs, such that the
negative relationship was stronger for group members who rated higher on
agreeableness.
The findings contribute to the abusive supervision literature
by focusing on the largely overlooked group members’ aggregated perception of
abusive supervision. In so doing, this study constituted ASC. In addition, the
cross-level effects of ASC on group members’ behaviour has been examined via
their anger as a mediating link in transmitting the adverse effects of ASC on
group members’ OCBs and withdrawal, thereby explaining the process through
which ASC affects group members’ behaviours. Furthermore, it incorporates their
personality differences in order to better understand their behavioural
responses in a negative emotional state (anger). Further theoretical
contributions and practical implications are discussed at the conclusion of the
document.