Reason: Restricted by author. A copy can be supplied under Section 51(2) of the Australian Copyright Act 1968 by submitting a document delivery request through your library or by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org
A study of the relationship between unit and surgeon volume and the outcomes of cardiac surgery in Australia
In order to distinguish essays and pre-prints from academic theses, we have a separate category. These are often much longer text based documents than a paper.
posted on 15.02.2017by Ch'ng, Stephanie
In recent decades, increased emphasis on patient safety in cardiac surgery has provoked scrutiny of the research findings that suggest an association between hospital and/or surgeon volume and patient mortality for various inpatient procedures. Volume is an easy to measure variable, more so than other aspects or processes of care, and the potential relationship between cardiac surgical volume and mortality is widely documented. However, volume itself, especially hospital/unit volume, may not be a meaningful proxy for quality of care; some of the less commonly measured factors
including processes of care and individual surgeon caseload, may have a more direct or larger influence on outcomes. This has important implications, given the trend among policymakers to use hospital volume as a central factor in deliberations regarding patient referrals, regionalisation and agreement on accreditation standards for certain procedures. As such, the purpose of this thesis is to explore the potential association and the strength of that association between unit volume and operative mortality in Australia and New Zealand with a specific focus on two areas of cardiac surgery: coronary artery bypass grafting (CAB G), and valve surgery (aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, and tricuspid valve surgery).