A corpus of ephebic inscriptions from Roman Athens : 31 B.C. - 267 A.D.
thesis
posted on 2016-12-05, 00:57authored byWilson, Paul
The following corpus is a collection of inscriptions from Athens, dated between 31
B.C. and 267 A.D. The texts were inscribed to commemorate activities of youths and
their instructors in the Athenian Ephebia
The Introduction outlines the editorial conventions observed, the method of
presentation, which is somewhat unusual, and the difficulties encountered in completing
such a massive task.
The remainder of the work comprises the corpus of inscriptions. Each inscription
is preceded by an introduction which should contain the descriptions, dimensions and
editorial history of each fragment. For lost inscriptions or those outside Greece, some or
all of these details may be missing (see p.3). The introduction is followed by the Greek
text. A graphic follows, which usually depicts readings that I made from the stone:
sometimes they are from a squeeze, once or twice from a photograph, and sometimes
from an earlier copy of a lost inscription. Below the graphic are the notes which discuss
where applicable the more significant new readings and any problems in the text. The
entry concludes with a note on the date.
The various types of ephebic inscriptions are grouped together; and within the
groups are arranged in chronological order. The agonistic inscriptions, which
commemorate the athletic activities of the ephebes, are presented in the first chapter. The
second contains the small number of dedications and commemorative inscriptions
preserved. In the third chapter are the numerous honorary inscriptions. These are
personal monuments, set up in honour of a small number of the ephebes or their teachers
and often honouring a single individual.
The chapters which follow contain the ephebic catalogues. These do not differ
essentially in purpose from the honorary inscriptions: thcy were inscribed to honour
ephebes and their teachers. Yet they may list any number from a dozen to several hundred
ephebes at one time. In the larger catalogues, the honours are rather thinly spread, but the
names of the more important ephebic office holders and teachers may be inscribed
prominently. Sometimes the figures of the most notable individuals may be carved in
relief on the stele.
The corpus is essentially source material collected for the use of other epigraphers
and historians. It is hoped it will prove useful in studying the prosopography and history
of Athens during this much-neglected period of its history.