Reason: Under embargo until July 2020. After this date a copy can be supplied under Section 51 (2) of the Australian Copyright Act 1968 by submitting a document delivery request through your library
A Cultural History of Fatherhood in Australia, 1920-1980
thesis
posted on 2017-07-18, 06:22authored byJohnny Bell
This thesis is an
exploration of different narratives of Australian fatherhood throughout the
twentieth century. It is a study of the cultural representations of fathers,
and of the expectations of what fathers should be, but it is also a study which
examines the experiences of fathering and of being fathered. From a diversity
of sources – childrearing manuals, the case files of a children’s protection
society, women’s magazines, Australian life writing, royal commissions, and
medical literature – comes a diversity of perspectives on Australian
fatherhood, and from this the thesis makes two primary arguments. The first,
put simply, is that ideas and images of Australian fatherhood have undergone
considerable change over the decades from the 1920s to 1980. While the
breadwinning model was the dominant ideal of Australian fatherhood for most of
this period, even in the 1920s there were calls for men to attend to the
emotional life of their children, and to their moral wellbeing. By the 1950s
there were hopes that fathers might share in the more mundane, day-to-day
demands of childrearing, even before the gender revolution of the 1960s and
1970s declared that the breadwinning model of fatherhood was not just
inadequate, but also unjust. The often- overlooked story of Australian
fatherhood, then, is revealed as dynamic, shifting, and always contested. The
other argument of this thesis, though, is that Australian fatherhood in the
twentieth century has been marked by continuities as much as change. In this,
it will be seen that the different narratives of Australian fatherhood have
often been curbed, resisted, or muted by ‘traditional’ ideas of how children
should be raised. An important part of this resistance came from that vision of
Australian masculinity which has always eschewed the humdrum and ‘feminising’
demands of the home, and the relationship between masculine identity and
fatherhood is an important theme of this work. But this work also takes care to
locate Australian fatherhood in the broader context of gender relations, and in
doing so it will be seen that the sternest resistance to a ‘new fatherhood’
often came from the enduring mythologies of an omnipotent and naturally
nurturing mother.
History
Principal supervisor
Christina Twomey
Additional supervisor 1
Mark Peel
Additional supervisor 2
Michael Hau
Year of Award
2017
Department, School or Centre
Philosophical, Historical and International Studies