<p dir="ltr">This research contribution introduces how fermentation has informed my newly developed methods and methodology, termed <i>Fermethod</i>, <i>Fermentology </i>and<i> </i>the Fermentation Intelligences<i> </i><i>Fermentillgences</i>. It further positions fermentation as a teacher through the centring of seven fermentation intelligences, including, poly-temporalities, preserving and transforming (Fournier, 2020), agitating towards stability (Chen, 2018), interspecies kinship (Haraway, 2016), contamination (Katz, 2003, 2020; Tsing, 2015), sensorial knowing and magic + joy.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Slide 1: Fermentation Intelligences</b><br>Positions fermentation as a teacher through the centring of seven fermentation intelligences,including poly-temporalities, preserving and transforming (Fournier, 2020), agitating towards stability (Chen, 2018), interspecies kinship (Haraway, 2016), contamination (Katz, 2003, 2020; Tsing, 2015), sensorial knowing and magic + joy. The fermentation intelligences support the re-evaluating of deep learning intentions in research projects.</p><p dir="ltr"><br><b>Slide 2: Fermentology</b><br>Describes <i>Fermentology</i>, a newly created methodology that functions as both a research framework and a value system. It advocates for a processual and emergent understanding of knowledge creation through prioritising, slowness, situatedness (Haraway, 2016), collaboration (Tsing, 2015), transformation (Tsing, 2015) and porosity (Katz, 2020). Aligned with a post qualitative (St Pierre, 2014, 2017, 2021; Le Grange, 2018) approach, <i>Fermentology</i> integrates the <i>Vital Forces</i>, and emphasises the importance of time, context, and relational dynamics in the creation and dissemination of knowledge.<br><br><b>Slide 3: Fermethod</b><br>Outlines the <i>Fermethods</i>, which build upon Colebrook (2017) and Lenz Taguchi and St.Pierre's (2017) notion of 'concept as method' and draw upon my material investigations with fermentation. I propose the following <i>Fermethods</i> as tools to inform the data analysis and distillation process, they are, <i>chopping, preserving, bruising, packing, soaking and bubbling</i>. They are informed by what Colebrook (2017) terms 'intensive concepts,' where "the concept itself operates as a method, derived directly from the problem it addresses" (p. 654), furthermore they emphasise a departure from traditional humanist and individualist research methods.<br></p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><p dir="ltr"><b>Conclusion</b><br>This research output not only advances conceptual approaches to methods and methodology, it also offers a tangible 'research container' to aid other researchers and academics in applying these innovative concepts. By embracing the complex and transformative nature of fermentation, this offering invites a rethinking of traditional research methodologies, promoting a more reflective, and dynamic approach to academic inquiry.</p><p dir="ltr"><br><b>References</b><br><br></p><ul><li>Chen, M. Y. (2018). Agitation. <i>South Atlantic Quarterly</i>, <i>117</i>(3), 551–566. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-6942147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-6942147</a></li><li>Colebrook, C. (2017). What Is This Thing Called Education? <i>Qualitative Inquiry</i>, <i>23</i>(9), 649–655. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725357</a></li><li>Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. <i>Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais</i>, <i>126</i>, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.12507</li><li>Fournier, L. (2020). Fermenting Feminism as Methodology and Metaphor. <i>Environmental Humanities</i>, <i>12</i>(1), 88–112. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142220</a><br>Haraway, D. (2016). <i>Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene</i>. Duke University Press.</li><li>Katz, S. (2003). <i>The Revolution Will Not Be Microwaved | Wild Fermentation : Wild Fermentation</i>. Wild Fermentation. <a href="https://www.wildfermentation.com/the-revolution-will-not-be-microwaved/" target="_blank">https://www.wildfermentation.com/the-revolution-will-not-be-microwaved/</a></li><li>Katz, S. (2012). <i>The Art of Fermentation</i>. Chelsea Green Publishing Co.</li><li>Katz, S. (2016). <i>Wild fermentation : the flavor, nutrition, and craft of live-culture foods</i>. Chelsea Green Publishing.</li><li>Katz, S. (2020). <i>Fermentation as metaphor</i>. Chelsea Green Publishing.</li><li>Le Grange, L. (2018). Leading article: What is (post)quanlitative research? <i>South African Journal of Higher Education</i>, <i>32</i>(5). <a href="https://doi.org/10.20853/32-5-3161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.20853/32-5-3161</a></li><li>Taguchi, H. L., & St.Pierre, E. A. (2017). Using Concept as Method in Educational and Social Science Inquiry. <i>Qualitative Inquiry</i>, <i>23</i>(9), 643–648. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732634</a></li><li>Tsing, A. (2015). <i>The Mushroom At The End Of The World: On The Possibility Of Life In Capitalist Ruins</i>. Princeton University Press.</li><li>Stengers, I. (2015). <i>In catastrophic times : resisting the coming barbarism</i>. Open Humanities Press/Meson Press.</li><li>St. Pierre, E.A. (2014). A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research: Toward “Post Inquiry.” <i>Journal of Curriculum Theorizing</i>, <i>30</i>(2), 2.</li><li>St. Pierre, E. A. (2017). Writing Post Qualitative Inquiry. <i>Qualitative Inquiry</i>, <i>24</i>(9), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734567</li><li>St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New. <i>Qualitative Inquiry</i>, <i>27</i>(1), 107780041986300. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005</a></li><li>Van Groll, N., & Kummen, K. (2021). Troubled Pedagogies and COVID-19: Fermenting New Relationships and Practices in Early Childhood Care and Education. <i>Journal of Childhood Studies</i>, <i>46</i>(3), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs463202120047</li></ul><p><br></p>