<b>What do we know about how organisational factors shape individual academics’ research agendas and how do we know it?</b> - Good Questions Review

<h3><b>What do we know about how organisational factors shape individual academics’ research agendas and how do we know it?</b></h3><p dir="ltr">This is a post from a living literature review project called Good Questions Review. The latest posts from the project can be found on <i>https://www.monash.edu/msdi/research/good-questions-review/</i> and their versions of record are deposited here on Monash University's Bridges system.</p><p dir="ltr">See document for text.</p><p dir="ltr">Good Questions Review explores emerging insights about how social science research can be more useful for making decisions. Articles will be guided by at least one of the following questions:</p><ul><li>What are the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches we currently identify, develop, and prioritise questions and set research agendas?</li><li>What makes "good" questions in the social sciences for policy and program impact? How is this changing? How should it change?</li><li>Who writes "good" questions? In what conditions and with what skills? Who needs to be involved for better questions addressing complex social issues?</li></ul><p dir="ltr">This Good Questions Review post was written by Paul Kellner in his role as Research Fellow at the <a href="https://www.monash.edu/msdi" target="_blank">Monash Sustainable Development Institute</a> through support from <a href="https://www.openphilanthropy.org/" target="_blank">Open Philanthropy</a>.</p>