posted on 2019-10-29, 09:19authored byMatthew Groves
The rule against bias requires that judges approach their task with an open mind though not an empty one. The bias rule does not preclude judges from presiding simply because they have knowledge, experience or views relevant to a case. The question is always one of degree and context. This article examines how questions of bias may arise when judges make public statements outside their reasons for decisions, such as in media interviews, speeches or scholarly publications. It will argue that judges can and should make public statements but that the judicial function necessarily limits what judges can and should say in their public statements.
History
Publication Date
2014
Volume
40
Issue
1
Type
Article
Pages
115–147
AGLC Citation
Matthew Groves, ‘Public Statements by Judges and the Bias Rule’ (2014) 40(1) Monash University Law Review 114