Monash University
Browse

Public Statements by Judges and the Bias Rule

Download (441.46 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-29, 09:19 authored by Matthew Groves
The rule against bias requires that judges approach their task with an open mind though not an empty one. The bias rule does not preclude judges from presiding simply because they have knowledge, experience or views relevant to a case. The question is always one of degree and context. This article examines how questions of bias may arise when judges make public statements outside their reasons for decisions, such as in media interviews, speeches or scholarly publications. It will argue that judges can and should make public statements but that the judicial function necessarily limits what judges can and should say in their public statements.

History

Publication Date

2014

Volume

40

Issue

1

Type

Article

Pages

115–147

AGLC Citation

Matthew Groves, ‘Public Statements by Judges and the Bias Rule’ (2014) 40(1) Monash University Law Review 114

Usage metrics

    Monash University Law Review

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC