Version 2 2021-12-18, 02:47Version 2 2021-12-18, 02:47
Version 1 2021-01-25, 06:52Version 1 2021-01-25, 06:52
journal contribution
posted on 2021-12-18, 02:47authored byGE Dal Pont
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Nearly 30 years ago an Australian judge remarked that the charging
of cancellation fees by counsel was a new phenomenon, before
branding it as one to be questioned. The interim has witnessed a
broadening of this practice, grounded in addressing the opportunity
cost for barristers when a matter does not proceed to final
adjudication according to schedule. At a time when both legislators
and judges lament the costs hurdles to accessing justice, and in the
absence to date of any scholarly treatment of the cancellation fee
topic in the Australian literature, it is apt to investigate and examine
the varying judicial and professional views that have emerged
in this context. The article concludes by calling for at least some
professional pronouncement in this space.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
History
Publication Date
2020
Volume
46
Issue
2
Type
Journal Article
Pages
52–78
AGLC Citation
GE Dal Pont, 'Lawyer Cancellation Fees' (2020) 46(2) Monash University Law Review 52