Monash University
Browse
02. MonULR - Steele.pdf (690.44 kB)

Law and Disability ‘Supported’ Employment in Australia: The Case for Ending Segregation, Discrimination, Exploitation and Violence against People with Disability at Work

Download (690.44 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-15, 04:37 authored by Linda Steele

This article argues for transition away from Australian Disability Enterprises (‘ADEs’) on the basis that they further segregation, discrimination, exploitation and violence against people with disability. ADEs (previously ‘sheltered workshops’) overwhelmingly impact people with intellectual and cognitive disability. In ADEs, employees with disability receive less than award wages. They work in segregated settings where they are separate from and in unequal relationships with employees without disability. While sometimes framed as an opportunity for skills development, ADE employees with disability are unlikely to move into open employment. Currently, a variety of laws across diverse domains, including disability services law, industrial relations law and guardianship law, provide legal basis for ADEs as necessary and beneficial to people with disability and organisations that operate ADEs receiving financial benefit from the unequal treatment of ADE employees with disability. Legal institutions with authority to help dismantle ADEs — the Commonwealth legislature, the Fair Work Commission (‘FWC’) and Federal Court — have further entrenched ADEs in law by dismissing claims that they are harmful to people with disability. Ultimately, the article provides a basis for the need for law reform to transition away from ADEs in a broader context of enhancing dignity, equality and self-determination of people with disability.

History

Publication Date

2023

Volume

49

Issue

2

Type

Journal Article

Pages

1–46

AGLC Citation

Linda Steele, ‘Law and Disability “Supported” Employment in Australia: The Case for Ending Segregation, Discrimination, Exploitation and Violence against People with Disability at Work’ (2023) 49(2) Monash University Law Review (advance).

Usage metrics

    Monash University Law Review

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC