Examining negotiation in peer group oral assessment: what are the implications?
journal contributionposted on 03.05.2017, 01:41 by Gan, Zhengdong
This article reports on a case study of negotiation that occurred in peer group oral interactions under assessment conditions. Discourse analysis was used to illustrate how participants negotiated and co-constructed the assessment format itself as well as meaning exchange sequences. Analyses of the data point to the advantage of using peer group discussion task in generating the interaction patterns representative of natural conversational situations. By concentrating on the situated dynamics and process of peer group functioning, this study also demonstrates the importance of peer learning opportunities that resulted from collaborative reasoning under assessment conditions, which have typically been ignored in the conventional testing paradigm. Implications of these findings over validity issues in oral language assessment are discussed. Copyright 2007 Zhengdong Gan. No part of this article may be reproduced by any means without the written consent of the publisher.