posted on 2019-10-29, 09:21authored byMary Anne Noone;Lola Akin Ojelabi
This article addresses the issue of access to justice and mediation. Australian state and federal Attorneys-General have identifi ed mediation as an important tool in improving access to justice for ordinary citizens. Shifts in government policy have greatly increased the use of mediation as a means of resolving disputes in civil matters in both courts and tribunals. Policy makers, practitioners, courts and tribunals aspire to refl ect the values of the ‘access to justice movement’ in the increased use of mediation. This article reports on fi ndings from empirical qualitative research that sought to identify what those in the mediation fi eld think about mediation and justice and how they seek to guard against perpetuating disadvantage in mediation and thus improve access to justice. The insights provided by practitioners, mediation service providers and policy makers, tribunal members and magistrates, about issues relating to mediation and justice are detailed. Whether mediation should be concerned with justice and, if so, whether it should be concerned with procedural or substantive justice or both is explored. The conclusion suggests how the justice quality of mediation could be measured to ensure access to justice is enhanced for the disadvantaged and not diminished.
History
Publication Date
2014
Volume
40
Issue
2
Type
Article
Pages
528–563
AGLC Citation
Mary Anne Noone and Lola Akin Ojelabi, 'Ensuring Access to Justice in Mediation within the Civil Justice System' (2014) 40(2) Monash University Law Review 527