Monash University
Browse

Does the Despoiler of Water Have a Proprietary Right in the Commingled Product? Implications for Property Law and Criminal Procedure

Download (521.63 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-29, 09:07 authored by Lynden Griggs;Terese Henning;Jeremy Prichard
This paper considers who owns wastewater. Our view is that the common law notions of proprietary rights are incapable of providing the nuanced solution necessary to this question. This solution must encompass the public interest in maintaining a viable and safe waste disposal system. But equally the solution must encompass two new uses of wastewater. First, as water authorities increasingly extract a value from the consumer in respect of wastewater it has become an economic resource to which each member of the public is an important contributor. Second, wastewater is emerging as a potential source of intelligence for criminal investigators. We suggest that proprietary rights do not provide the solution to the dilemma of the ownership of wastewater. Further, while relevant, they do not mark out the boundaries of state obligations or powers in sampling wastewater for the purpose of criminal investigations. The law in this context is uncertain. Potentially it provides few protections to citizens’ privacy interests. This places the onus fairly on legislatures to engage with these issues and construct policies and laws that achieve an appropriate balance between the interests of law enforcement agents and those of the citizenry.

History

Publication Date

2012

Volume

38

Issue

3

Type

Article

Pages

35–54

AGLC Citation

Lynden Griggs, Terese Henning and Jeremy Prichard, 'Does the Despoiler of Water Have a Proprietary Right in the Commingled Product? Implications for Property Law and Criminal Procedure' (2012) 38(3) Monash University Law Review 34

Usage metrics

    Monash University Law Review

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC