Version 5 2025-08-26, 05:40Version 5 2025-08-26, 05:40
Version 4 2025-08-26, 05:31Version 4 2025-08-26, 05:31
Version 3 2025-08-26, 05:29Version 3 2025-08-26, 05:29
Version 2 2025-06-14, 08:21Version 2 2025-06-14, 08:21
Version 1 2025-06-14, 04:53Version 1 2025-06-14, 04:53
journal contribution
posted on 2025-08-26, 05:40authored byLuke Nottage
<p dir="ltr">International commercial arbitration (‘ICA’) has proliferated worldwide, often cross-fertilising with investor–state arbitration (‘ISA’). Yet costs and delays are resurgent. Little cross-fertilisation with international mediation has occurred in the form of Arb-Med (arbitrators themselves acting as mediators). There has been growth instead in Med-Arb (separate mediation before arbitration), albeit not uniformly and not yet in ISA. Cross-fertilisation from ISA to ICA is evident in assessing whether noncompliance with agreed pre-arbitration steps generally goes to jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal or merely admissibility of claims. This article urges more attention to these and other possible examples of cross-fertilisation among ICA, ISA and mediation, especially as such interactions may or may not effectively reduce costs and delays in cross-border dispute resolution.</p>
History
Publication Date
2024
Volume
50
Issue
3
Type
Journal Article
Pages
369–405
AGLC Citation
Luke Nottage, 'Cross-Fertilisation in International Commercial Arbitration, Investor–State Arbitration and Mediation: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly?' (2024) 50(3) Monash University Law Review 369.