Monash University
Browse

An Ancient Remedy for Modern Ills: The Prerogative of Mercy and Mandatory Sentencing

Download (605.78 kB)
Version 2 2021-12-18, 03:06
Version 1 2021-11-16, 01:32
journal contribution
posted on 2021-12-18, 03:06 authored by Julian R Murphy, Felicity Gerry, Rebecca Tisdale, Julia Kretzenbacher

The prerogative of mercy is an ancient power to forgive, or temper the punishment of, a legal wrong. In the Middle Ages in England, and later in colonial Australia, it was regularly used to spare the lives of persons found guilty of offences carrying mandatory death sentences. Scholarship and case law considering the prerogative of mercy in the United Kingdom and Australia have almost exclusively focused on its application to pardon persons whose convictions are attended by doubt, irregularity or other infirmity. This article takes a different perspective, highlighting the continued, albeit limited potential application of the prerogative of mercy to alleviate the injustices occasioned by mandatory sentencing. This potential application of the prerogative of mercy is explored in its historical, theoretical and contemporary dimensions, with the contemporary discussion focusing on a recent Australian case study. Drawing upon the case study and the historical and theoretical discussion, this article concludes by making practical recommendations as to how defence lawyers might begin to more regularly petition for mercy in mandatory sentencing cases.

History

Publication Date

2020

Volume

46

Issue

3

Type

Journal Article

Pages

252–84

AGLC Citation

Julian R Murphy et al, 'An Ancient Remedy for Modern Ills: The Prerogative of Mercy and Mandatory Sentencing' (2020) 46(3) Monash University Law Review 252

Usage metrics

    Monash University Law Review

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC