A Review of Methodological Issues in the Conduct of Willingness-to-Pay Studies in Health Care III: Issues in the Analysis and Interpretation of WTP Data

Cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility, analyses have historically been the most widely used techniques of economic evaluation applied to the evaluation of health care programs. However, in recent years there has been renewed interest in the use of cost-benefit analysis, which requires the assessment of programme benefits in monetary terms. The emerging consensus is that such monetary valuation is most appropriately obtained using a survey of individual `willingness-to-pay' (WTP) for the program of interest. There are obviously a considerable number of methodological issues and potential biases to be considered in performing such a survey, which may be grouped into three main areas: (i) the construction and specification of the contingent market; (ii) the administration of the survey; and (iii) the analysis and interpretation of the WTP data. In addition, there are a few issues which also warrant consideration, such as assessing validity and the impact of ability to pay and income distribution issues. This paper is concerned with assessing the analysis and interpretation of WTP data, including the assessment of validity and distributional impact of WTP. The paper considers the literature relating to these issues, and uses this to derive a set of `recommendations' for current `state of the art' conduct of WTP surveys with respect to market construction. WTP studies conducted to date in health and health care are then reviewed with such recommendations in mind, to assess the degree to which they reflect this `state of the art'. It is concluded that such studies perform poorly when judged in this manner.