MonULR-42(2)-1.pdf (374.78 kB)

Contextualising Lawyer Overcharging

Download (374.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 29.10.2019, 09:32 by GE Dal Pont
The law recognises various avenues directed to controlling costs as between lawyer and client, which assume significance in the modern competitive legal market. Competition has prompted many lawyers to pursue an increasingly mercantile approach to legal practice, directed at profit maximisation. The latter reveals a tension not just with avenues to control costs but with traditional notions of professionalism. What lies at the pivot in this tension, and its ethical dimension, is the prospect of professional discipline for overcharging. Contextualised by the foregoing backdrop, this article investigates this ethical dimension, in a quest to flesh out its parameters.
Logo branding

Categories

Keywords

History

Publication Date

2016

Volume

42

Issue

2

Type

Article

Pages

283–307

AGLC Citation

GE Dal Pont, ‘Contextualising Lawyer Overcharging’ (2016) 42(2) Monash University Law Review 282

Exports

Logo branding

Categories

Keywords

Exports