Data from: How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.

<p dir="ltr"><b>When using this data, please cite the original publication:</b></p><p dir="ltr">Jared Lush, Connor Bevan, Carla M. Sgrò, and Matthew D. Hall(2025) How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Files in this package:</b></p><p dir="ltr">Title: lush-et-al-cline-infected-knockdown.csv</p><p dir="ltr">Description: Data for the influence of host clone, acclimation temperature, and infection outcomes on variation in time to immobilisation (i.e., knockdown times). </p><p dir="ltr">Listed are the <i>Daphnia</i> clone (clone: PLD, BWD, WWD, BLD, YYD or OZD), the latitude of the population from which each clone was sampled (latSOUTH in °S), the individual ID of each animal (ID), the acclimation temperature of the animals (temp: 20 °C or 25 °C), the experimental block (block), the size of the animal (in mm), the knockdown times (death_time in minutes), and the outcome of infection (infected, Yes = animals that were exposed to a pathogen and became infected; and for reference, No = control animals that were never exposed to the pathogen).</p><table><tr><td></td></tr></table><p></p>