Monash University
Browse
MonULR-41(2)-4.pdf (648.01 kB)

Private Law and Grave Historical Injustice: The Role of the Common Law

Download (648.01 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-29, 09:27 authored by Simone Degeling;Kit Barker
This article reclaims an important role for the common law in cases of grave historical injustice, which we define as serious, widespread instances of wrongdoing that have remained unaddressed and un-redressed for long periods of time. Contemporary examples in Australia include the abuse of vulnerable individuals within the Catholic Church and Australian Defence Force, and the historical theft of wages from Aboriginal peoples. Contemporary discourse assumes that private law has little to contribute to the debate about how to deal with such cases. It focuses instead on public apologies and limited reparations schemes, on the basis that these offer victims quicker, more satisfactory solutions. We suggest an important role for private law and its corrective justice framework in informing and enhancing the design of reparations schemes current and future, so as to accord victims a fuller and more meaningful measure of justice.

History

Publication Date

2015

Volume

41

Issue

2

Type

Article

Pages

377–413

AGLC Citation

Simone Degeling and Kit Barker, 'Private Law and Grave Historical Injustice: The Role of the Common Law' (2015) 41(2) Monash University Law Review 376

Usage metrics

    Monash University Law Review

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC